LiquidMind Academy

ICT/SMC concept library with interactive charts

LiquidMind Core Engine/

Scoring & Ranking Engine

SystemMathConfluence

TL;DR

Every setup is mathematically graded 0–100 before execution. LiquidMind weights each component differently depending on the role of the timeframe being evaluated — Origin, LTF Entry, or other HTF confluence — and then aggregates across all timeframes using a per-origin weighting matrix.

Interactive ChartBTCUSDT · 4H
lightweight-charts
Grade Ranking SystemScore 0 → 100
A+
90100
Excellent
A
8089
Very Good
B
6579
Good
C
5064
Average
D
3049
Below Average
E
029
Poor / Rejected
Origin TF

POI timeframe — main context

Trend Alignment44%
POI Strength33%
FVG Liquidity11%
MCB Momentum11%
LTF Entry TF

Entry execution timeframe

Displacement75%
MCB Momentum15%
FVG Liquidity10%
Other HTF

HTF confluence timeframes

Trend Alignment40%
MCB Momentum40%
FVG Liquidity20%
Multi-TF Aggregation WeightsOrigin TF → per-TF contribution
OriginWD4H1H15m5m1m
W
50%
10%
10%
5%
25%
D
10%
45%
10%
5%
30%
4H
5%
10%
45%
10%
30%
1H
2%
3%
10%
45%
10%
30%
5%
15m
2%
3%
5%
5%
45%
10%
30%
Origin TF (diagonal)
LTF entry — heaviest after origin
Not used for this origin

How It Works

  1. 1

    Origin TF (main context): Trend Alignment 44% · POI Strength 33% · FVG Liquidity 11% · MCB Momentum 11%. Trend and POI receive a 1.5× priority boost because this is the timeframe that defines the setup.

  2. 2

    LTF Entry TF: Displacement 75% · MCB Momentum 15% · FVG Liquidity 10%. Entry execution is dominated by displacement quality — a clean, impulsive move away from the POI is the primary gating condition.

  3. 3

    Other HTF (confluence): Trend Alignment 40% · MCB Momentum 40% · FVG Liquidity 20%. Higher timeframe alignment is judged equally on trend direction and MCB momentum structure.

  4. 4

    Multi-TF Aggregation: The final score is a weighted sum across all active timeframes. For a 1H origin, the 1H score carries 45%, the 5m entry carries 30%, and 4H/D/W provide confluence at 10%/3%/2%. Each origin TF has its own aggregation map.

  5. 5

    Grade Thresholds: A+ (90–100) Excellent · A (80–89) Very Good · B (65–79) Good · C (50–64) Average · D (30–49) Below Average · E (0–29) Poor/Rejected.

LiquidMind AI Context

The engine never treats all timeframes equally. A Weekly origin setup assigns 50% of its final score to the Weekly itself and 25% to the 15m entry — reflecting the reality that a monthly-scale POI demands precise entry timing. Grades D and E result in automatic rejection. Grades A and A+ unlock full position sizing. This mathematical structure ensures the bot scales into conviction, not guesswork.

System monitors this pattern in real-time